\n
Lots of tutorials which are attended by prof. Denis if you have questions<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n\n \n- \n
Content is not very interesting (may be interesting to some, though) and not at all enjoyable to memorize, you really need to know your stuff\/know the details to do well in this class<\/p><\/div>\n<\/li>\n - \n
\n Exams are long and fairly difficult<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/li>\n - \n
\n Some professors are better than others<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n \n\n \n- \n
GO TO THE PROBLEM SOLVING LECTURES! Denis and other profs often will ask similar questions on the exam or ask questions in such a way that requires you to know stuff from those sessions.<\/p><\/div>\n<\/li>\n - \n
\n Practice drawing out and understanding pathways<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n \n\n \n- \n
\n 50% midterm<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/li>\n - \n
\n 50% final<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n\n\n \n BIOL 301: Cell and Molecular Laboratory<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/td> \n\n \n- \n
\n This course was redone in Winter 2020 and is much more useful\/interesting than it was before<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/li>\n - \n
\n Cool premise in that you are essentially working on one project throughout the semester so it really feels like a research experience<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/li>\n - \n
\n TONS of hands on experience (pipetting, using PCR, loading gel, at the end you get to send your results to be genotyped with Genome Quebec)<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/li>\n - \n
\n No final<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/li>\n - \n
\n Easy pre-lab quizzes<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/li>\n - \n
\n Most labs don’t go 7 hours<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/li>\n - \n
\n Lots of free time so you can do other work or work on projects<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n \n\n \n- \n
\n Even though they are shorter, labs can still feel like they go really late (especially when dark)<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/li>\n - \n
\n TAs don’t help you with lab reports much\/aren’t very helpful<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/li>\n - \n
\n Lectures are so useless and don’t correspond with what’s going on in the lab so they aren’t even helpful when you write lab reports<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/li>\n - \n
\n Rigorous\/nitpicky grading<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n \n\n \n- \n
\n Start your written assignments early because marking is fairly rigorous and you’ll want to make sure it’s well-thought out<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n \n\n \n- \n
\n 60% Lab reports<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/li>\n - \n
\n 15% Research proposal<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/li>\n - \n
\n 15% Research project<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/li>\n - \n
\n 10% Oral presentation on both proposal and project<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n\n\n \n PHAR 300: Drug Action<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/td> \n\n \n- \n
\n Really interesting<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/li>\n - \n
\n Nice mix of anecdotal and empirical studies to keep it more engaging<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/li>\n - \n
\n If you do poorly on an exam Dr. Zorychta will schedule a one-on-one to go over the exam with you<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n \n\n \n- \n
\n Prof doesn’t post slides<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/li>\n - \n
\n Questions test on every detail of the lecture and sometimes it will feel like you’ve never heard of something mentioned<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/li>\n - \n
\n Not much text on slides so you have to really listen + interpret what she’s saying<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/li>\n - \n
\n Type C questions can be tricky<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n \n\n \n- \n
\n If you can, get the NTCs, they help summarize + synthesize what can sometimes seem like a disorganized lecture<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/li>\n - \n
\n Make note of small random details the prof mentions – she will likely test this<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n \n\n \n- \n
\n 35% Midterm<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/li>\n - \n
\n 65% Final<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n\n\n \n PHAR 301: Drugs and Disease<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/td> \n\n \n- \n
\n Very interesting<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/li>\n - \n
\n Cool because you learn about the disease for half the class and then you talk about the drugs to treat it, so the lectures flow well and are organized<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/li>\n - \n
\n Lectures tend to have some discussions, which is engaging<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n \n\n \n- \n
\n Sometimes profs try to stump you on exams<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/li>\n - \n
\n Lots of drugs to memorize<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n \n\n \n- \n
\n Make quizlets or flashcards for ALL the drug names!<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n \n\n \n- \n
\n 35% Midterm<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/li>\n - \n
\n 65% Final<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n\n\n \n PHAR 303: Principles of Toxicology<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/td> \n\n \n- \n
\n Straightforward material, usually pretty interesting<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/li>\n - \n
\n Profs (Hales and Dr. Robaire) are super sweet and understanding, genuinely care about the students and having them understand the importance of the class<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/li>\n - \n
\n Pretty easy midterm, there are short answer responses so be prepared for that<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/li>\n - \n
\n Interesting guest lecturers<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n \n\n \n- \n
\n Each week seems like a new\/random topic so class can seem disorganized<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/li>\n - \n
\n Some lectures can be quite boring<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n \n\n \n- \n
\n Start your presentations early, it makes it way easier to juggle your other courses in the winter<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n \n\n \n- \n
\n 30% midterm<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/li>\n - \n
\n 45% final<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/li>\n - \n
\n 25% oral presentation<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table><\/div><\/div>\n\n\n<\/div><\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n \n \n \n How do I choose my quantitative requirement? (tap to expand\/hide)<\/em><\/h4><\/span>\n <\/div><\/div>\n\n \n\n\n\n \n \n Course<\/p>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n<\/td> \n \n \n Pros<\/p>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n<\/td> \n \n \n Cons<\/p>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n<\/td> \n \n \n Comments or tips<\/p>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n<\/td> \n \n \n Evaluations<\/p>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n\n\n \n BIOC 373: Biometry<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/td> \n | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |